The price bottom for Southern California home may be getting closer!

July 26, 2008: Let’s start off by reiterating that this is risky business. There are lots of variables that could change in the months ahead, from interest rates to employment to the international scene. That’s why we continue to insist that nobody can predict the bottom with absolute certainty, as Freddie Mac’s chief economist Frank Northaft told us last fall. (See “How low will prices go?“)

Be that as it may, everybody wants to take their best guess at what’s coming next, and recent developments are making us think it may be time to update our projections.

The Housing Relief Bill

A big reason for our increasing optimism is President Bush’s pragmatic decision this week to accept $3.9 billion for cities to buy up and fix foreclosed properties as a trade-off for federal guarantees for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which should calm both the stock market and stabilize lending.

Although the additional deficit spending the bill may create will put some more upward pressure on interest rates, we do think it will go a long ways to reducing the glut of foreclosures. On the whole it seems to be a surprisingly good example of well-crafted, bipartisan legislation.

Besides the money to buy up foreclosures, other features in the bill that we like include:

1. A permanent increase in loan limits for Fannie, Freddie, and FHA to $625,000 in the highest cost areas like much of Southern California.

2. A tax credit of up to $7,500 for first time buyers who close escrow between 4/9/08 and 7/1/09. (We think this will increase demand, and recommend first time buyers contact us now so we can set them up with a personalized “web portal” which allows them to search, save, and categorize properties on the SoCal Multiple Listing Service. 562.822.SOLD.)

3. $11 billion in tax free municipal bond authority for states to set up low interest loans to first time buyers.

4. It tightens regulations to avoid future repeats of the recent mortgage meltdown.

5. Making FHA mortgages more available, especially for “work outs” of over encumbered (“upside down”) borrowers who qualify and whose lenders will participate by writing down the loan to 90% of the home’s current market value (details in the article below).

6. The complex but intriguing arrangement that encourages loan workouts instead of foreclosures or “short sales.” The lender reduces the loan amount to 10% below current market value in exchange for getting the loan off their books. The borrower agrees to share that 10% and future equity with the taxpayers. And we the taxpayers (also known as the government) guarantee the new loan through FHA, provided the buyer can qualify.

The total revised package is expected to sail through the Senate and Bush has now promised to sign it. While dangers of inflation and unemployment still threaten, we think the housing bill will have a more positive impact than we originally thought. Combine that with the fact that the market seems to be finding a bottom in terms of price, and we’re hopeful the positives will outweigh or at least neutralize the negatives of the normal summer slowdown, foreclosures, and shaky employment.

With that in mind, we’re now revising our projections as follows:

Our Current Best “Guestimate”

40% chance: Bottom sometime between now and the end of winter:

We think the limited time offer of $7,000 tax credits for first time buyers will provide a significant stimulus to a market where we’re already seeing multiple competing offers on well-priced bank REOs. At the same time, cities will begin bidding for some foreclosures, and others will see favorable workouts with the lenders which the bill makes possible.

Some of the bills provisions don’t kick in until October, but the tax relief is retroactive. We think the bottom will most likely coincide closely with our normal seasonal cycle, which bottoms in December or January. (We’re talking about escrows that open in December or January, which would close in February or March be reported by DataQuick a couple weeks later. See “Predictions 101: Our 2 market cycles” and “Two big problems with DataQuick’s monthly median price reports.“) However, it’s possible that the bottom may actually come earlier.

Of course, nobody will know for sure it’s a bottom until prices start rising in the months following. Then we’ll be wondering if it’s a false bottom through the following winter.

Which So Cal County will bottom first? All real estate is local, and we think Southern California’s Coastal Plane will hit the bottom first, followed by the desert and Inland Empire areas possibly a year later. This is due to the impact of gas prices on outlying areas plus overbuilding and more foreclosures there. Of the larger So Cal counties, we expect Orange County home prices to bottom first because it’s the most built-out and has the lowest percentage of starter homes. We expect either Los Angeles or San Diego County home prices to hit bottom next, followed by Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

Of the smaller counties, Santa Barbara looks like it’s already bottomed, with June foreclosures there hitting a 14 month low. Ventura County homes may be nearing a price bottom, while the smaller inland counties are largely in the same boat as the Inland Empire.

The other 60%: There are at least three challenges to a bottom this winter:

1. Inflation pushing interest rates up and reducing affordability.
2. The economic slowdown that we seem to be entering, with major job losses in automotive, construction, finance and real estate.
3. The continuing onslaught of foreclosures and resulting REOs.

40% chance: Bottom next winter. If the economy stabilizes and foreclosures slow down by year’s end, we could hit a bottom this winter. This is still the most common pick by most economists–recovery sometime in 2010, and has been consistently for the past year. We think the recent sharp decline in prices may speed things up. What would help even more would be a resumption of safe oil drilling offshore and in Alaska, with an excess profits tax being used to spur energy alternatives industries.

Again, we’re talking about the Coastal Plane areas of L.A. Orange and possibly San Diego Counties, with the Inland Empire and desert regions bottoming sometime in the following 14 months.

20% chance: Bottom later than next winter. Either a lengthy recession, or a bottom late winter of 2010-2011.

What to Do?

We still think market timing shouldn’t be as important as your personal situation in making housing or maybe even investing decisions. (See “What to do when nobody knows what’s next.”)

Sellers: Act now or be prepared to wait–maybe several years.

Buyers: There’s a significant chance that what we’re seeing now is as low as prices are going to go. But we’re saying there’s an equal chance that the bottom won’t hit until a year from this winter. And we’re also saying nobody can know for sure.

If you’re in a position to buy, start looking now & if you see something that works for you, make an offer at a price you can afford. You can use the MLS links in the right hand column to directly access any MLS in Southern California.

As a minimum, buyers should start saving your down payment (new concept, I know–check out wikipedia or google it) and get your credit in order (another new concept for some of us, but necessary now.) Do your Christmas shopping & card writing now, & see how the economy’s doing in November–it may be time to start writing lowball offers. Or to wait another year.

Although predicting a 40% chance of a bottom in the next five months hardly echos NAR’s “buy now!” theme, it’s dramatically more optimistic than we were just a few weeks ago. Of course, new developments could reduce or encourage our optimism. Stay tuned, & we’ll keep giving you our best projections based on what we’re reading, what we’re seeing on the front lines, & our experience of over 30 years in this amazing, interesting, and unpredictable business.

What Would Really Help

The “Housing Bailout Bill” seems like a pretty good example of Congressional give-and-take for the common good. We think there are two logical but somewhat radical additional steps our politicians need to take now to protect our economy and our way of life:

1. Modest steps to federal deficit reduction, specifically, reducing “pork.” I’m thinking of wasteful spending to get Legislators re-elected, like Alaska’s famous “Bridge to Nowhere.” Passing a bill eliminating such Congressional “earmarks” and also giving the next president a line-item veto would be a very simple step in the right direction. I’d also favor a mandatory deficit reduction bill that would impose across-the-board spending cuts and tax increases if our politicians couldn’t come up with budgets that meet a long term schedule to reduce the federal deficit. Taxing our great grandkids is the ultimate in “taxation without representation,” which our forefathers rightly considered tyranny.

2. Reduce the trade deficit by allowing careful new drilling for oil, but with a catch. The U.S. is sitting on more untapped oil reserves than any country in the world. I say use the revenue from that oil to create the best clean, renewable energy industries in the world. Open up more areas for safe drilling but dramatically increasing leasing fees on federal lands. Then split the billions in increased federal revenue between federal deficit reduction and renewable energy innovations.

That would undoubtedly strengthen the dollar, stimulate the economy, reduce the trade deficit, and lead to a cleaner environment. In the case of Alaska’s Arctic refuge, drilling would sacrifice less than .01% of ANWR to actual exploration in return for a $137 – $327 billion reduction in our trade balance (see Wikipedia, “Artic Refuge drilling controversy.”) We can keep sending our the money to the Saudis, or keep it here and use it for high paying jobs, deficit reduction, and energy innovations. Seems like a no-brainer to me, but I am a Realtor. . . .

We welcome your questions or comments

Fannie, Freddie, & IndyMac: What’s up, what’s down, & what to do

(7/12/08, 11 p.m.) I’ve been selling Los Angeles and Orange County real estate for 28 years. I’ve seen conforming loans at 18% in the early 80’s, S & L failures of the late 80’s and massive job losses in the early 90’s but I’ve never seen anything quite like the ongoing drama that’s unfolding before our eyes.

After working through the weekend, the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury announced late Sunday a series of moves designed to show strong support for the two semi-private bulwarks of U.S. mortgages. (Details here.)

This is more of a reaction to the housing and mortgage mess than any real solution. They’re not stopping the bleeding–just trying to keep it from increasing at an even faster rate.

In the short run Sunday’s actions keep the collapse in housing values from accelerating even more. Over the longer term they may actually reduce interest rates, and actually slow the ongoing downward cycle.

How We Got To This Point:

In our humble opinion the current mortgage and housing mess was caused by a combination of:

1. Excessive stimulus by the Fed after 9/11 at a time when the housing prices appeared to be heading towards a correction. (Essentially, interest rates were dropped and housing was used to keep the economy from crashing, possibly a wise move in view of the circumstances.)
2. The Fed delaying too long in raising rates, further prolonging the boom.
3. Perversely, fixed mortgage rates staying low when the Fed finally began raising the overnight rates they control, because long-bond investors sensed a downturn would result from the Fed rate increases.
4. The creation of unique but poorly designed and highly risky “sub prime” loans further extending the bubble. 4. (For a more detailed explanation, see “How we got into this mess.”)

The end result was a nightmare combination of extremely overvalued homes that were 100% financed or refinanced to shakey borrowers. Did I mention that many of the loans were written at ridiculously low “teaser” interest rates, which are now doubling, tripling, or worse.

All bubbles eventually burst, but the longer they last the further they must fall. Many of these loans, however, were based on the false premise that “real estate always goes up.” When the market stopped moving up, millions of serial refinancers had no place to turn, and the foreclosure parade began.

Eventually, prices dropped so low that even “prime” borrowers who put 20% down found out that they were upside down, which is how even Fannie and Freddie’s best loans began defaulting.

How’s that? The typical cost of selling a home is around 8 – 12% of a home’s value. That includes fees, escrow or closing, commissions, title insurance, termite, repairs, and, in this market, points for the buyer. Even without negative amortization, a 20% down borrower can’t break even after just a 10% decline in value. We’ve now passed a 25% decline in many Southern California markets. That doesn’t mean a borrowers with a fixed loan and good credit will defalut. . . . until one of them loses their job, or they get divorced, or have to relocate. Then they can’t sell the home, so their options are dramatically reduced. (For some of the options they still have, see “Trouble making your mortgage payment? 7 ways to get back on track“)

So, the lower prices go, the more people get in trouble, and the lower prices go, and the more people get in trouble, and the lower prices go. . . .

All of which makes investors very nervous about mortgage backed securities. Which makes it harder to qualify for mortgages, and also makes them more expensive. And which also makes it hard for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to sell their mortgage-backed securities. Which makes mortgages even harder to get and even more expensive. All of which makes prices go even lower.

That’s the vicious downward spiral we’re now in. That’s why I’ve been screaming that we desperately need the Federal Mortgage Act (bailout bill) that the Senate finally passed on Friday. (See “Better than I thought: Taxpayer protections in the “bailout” bill.”)

What the government did over the weekend was to take steps to simply keep solvent Fannie and Freddie, the guarantors of up to 80% of the mortgages now being originated. (Most of the other 20% are backed by the FHA or VA, although some S & Ls still “portfolio” or keep some of the loans they originate, rather than selling them off via Fannie, Freddie or FHA.)

The fall of IndyMac Bank, the third largest bank failure in U.S. history (in terms of dollars, but probably not adjusted for inflation), added further emphasis to the need for help.

So What’s Next?

The strong activity from buyers this year into summer gives good evidence that, even with rising interest rates and hard-to-get loans, prices have corrected enough to bring back buyers. But the ongoing flood of foreclosures expected well into 2009 will eventually swamp the limited pool of buyers, especially as we move out of the peak buying season. (See “Predictions 101: Our 2 market cycles“)

The weekend’s federal actions will at least keep the mortgage pipeline open, but it doesn’t solve the underlying problems. The Foreclosure relief bill will probably be fast tracked, but it will only help a limited number of borrowers. It will put a dent in the problem, but it won’t even come close to solving it.

Ongoing job losses in housing, finance, construction, home furnishings combined with auto industry problems and the huge losses being absorbed by investors don’t bode well for the future either.

(If you’re a homeowner or investor and are starting to feel a little like the Biblical patriarch, Job, you might appreciate my Pastor’s thoughts on the topic. For me, it helps keep things in perspective.)

We’ve been predicting further declines through this winter and possibly for another year or two. But, as we’ve been saying since November (See “How low will prices go?“), there are so many variables in play that nobody can predict what’s ahead with certainty. (Were you expecting this spring’s dramatic gas price rise?)

Bottom line: today’s prices are great, but they may be going lower. Maybe a lot lower. But there’s no way to know it’s hit bottom in advance. Because nobody really knows what’s ahead.

So you want to know”What to do when nobody knows what’s next.” Well, we already wrote that post, and it’s just a click away.

Note to potential sellers: The market has not died yet, and we have been consistently selling our listings in under 30 days by a combination of aggressive marketing, preparation, staging and negotiating plus accurate pricing. No, they’re not foreclosures, either. For details, check out “How to sell your So Cal home for top dollar in 30 days.” It could be a long time before prices return to today’s levels.

Buyers Southern California prices are expected to drop over the next 5 months and possibly for a lot longer, but you should also consider your personal situation and potentially rising interest rates. One thing’s for sure, if you buy today you’ll be paying a lot less than you would have a year ago! In any case, now’s definitely the time to start saving a down payment & get your finances in order, so you’ll be ready when you decide the time is right. Don’t run out and overspend on a car because you’re not buying a home.

For years I’ve been advising buyers to buy in November or December, but almost nobody has the time then–which is why it’s a great market for buyers. (For more thoughts for buyers see “Time to buy?“)

What we think needs to be done

Here’s where I’m taking an unexpected turn. The root problem became abundantly clear as gas prices rose this spring.

Because of our huge trade deficit, the U.S. is essentially becoming a third world nation, watching while Arab shieks buy up everything from Rancho Santa Fe horse property to the Chrysler building. And our oil dollars finance Al Queda, Hamas, and Iran’s nuclear program!

Meanwhile, we’re sitting on more untapped petroleum reserves than any other nation on the planet. I say it’s time to carefully open up offshore and Alaskan areas to oil drilling, but with a difference. As I understand it, current law allows oil companies remove oil from federal lands for free. I’ll bet Iran & Saudi Arabia don’t do that!

So I say, charge oil companies fair market for the oil they remove from our lands, but split that money between paying down the federal deficit and developing renewable energy sources. Let’s make the U.S. the number one source of clean petroleum alternatives.

Can you imagine the number of good jobs that would create, and the stimulus to our economy?

That’s what I think–& we’re eager to hear your thoughts!

Some surprising positives in the “mortgage bailout bill”

The following post is taken from our “new” location, SoCalRealEstateNews.com.  This discussion is extremely relevant now that the Senate has passed the “Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Acto of 2008.”   With the second largest bank failure in recent history yesterday plus the rumblings of problems for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, I expect this “bailout bill” will be fasttracked from here on out.

Last week I came across the Congressional Budget Office’s June 9 Cost Estimate of the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008, more commonly referred to as the housing “bailout bill.”

According to the generally reliable, non-partisan C.B.O., this bill should actually make $800,000,000 for the taxpayers. Yup, you read that right–it’s supposed to save us money, not cost us! I quote from the summary on p. 1 of the report:

CBO estimates that enacting this legislation would increase revenues by about$8.0 billion over the 2009-2018 period. . . . Over that period, we estimate that spending from those proceeds would total about $7.2 billion. The additional revenues would thus exceed direct spending by an estimated$800 million, decreasing future deficits (or increasing surpluses) by that amount over the next 10 years.

How is that possible? Well, far from giving borrowers and lenders a free ride, the bill actually makes participating lenders discount their note to 90% of current market value, and then makes the borrowers pay FHA 1.5% of the loan balance every year and then share 50% of their equity with the FHA when they eventually do sell!

Here’s how the C.B.O. explains it (p. 7, bolding mine):

This legislation also would require FHA to charge the borrower an annual fee of 1.5 percent of the remaining insured principal balance each year. Furthermore, the program would
provide that, upon sale, refinancing, or other disposition of the residence, the borrower
would pay to FHA a share of the new equity that would be created under the program.
(This new equity would be at least 10 percent of the property’s value because of the
required write down to no more than 90 percent of the current appraised value.) [note by Dave: Some or all of this 10% could disappear if the home declined further in value after the refinance]

FHA’s share would start at 100 percent of that newly created equity, and would drop to
50 percent in the sixth year of the term of the new loan; it would remain at that level for
the duration of the loan. In addition, upon sale or refinancing of the home, the borrower
would be required to pay FHA 50 percent of any appreciation in the appraised value of
the home since the date on which the mortgage was insured (excluding the initial
10 percent equity created by participating in the program).

Some feel this is excessively harsh on the borrower.  Well, but the lender reduced the loan balance to 90% of current market value, so that 10% equity was a gift from the lender to begin with. I’m not shedding tears for the lender, either–they’re the ones who got us into this mess with those ridiculous loans to begin with. (see “How we got into this mess“)

I do sympathize with some of the naive borrowers who trusted their lender (who was often also their Realtor) way too much, I think the main focus should be on protecting the overall economy against a collapse. Protecting the taxpayer would come second, then the borrower and the lender.

So if the cost of the program is the owner giving up half their equity, so be it. Remember, the lender’s making a major discount on the principal balance, so that’s basically a gift to the borrower. Sounds like a pretty sweet deal for the borrower to me. And not a bad deal for the taxpayer, either. (See “How we got into this mortgage mess.”)

Sounds like maybe it won’t cost the taxpayers anything, and maybe we all win. Perhaps this specific bailout bill’s not such a bad idea after all!

Maybe I was right about the need for this bill after all! (See “Why we need a mortgage relief bill.”)

There’s lots more to the report, some good & some bad from my perspective, but much better than I expected overall.

That’s my opinion–for now, at least. Feel free to share your opinion below, in relatively polite language, of course. (There is a lot of passion about this topic.)