Two Big Problems with DataQuick Median Prices

In about ten days, there will be much media noise as DataQuick releases their So Cal median price figures for March.

We expect sales will be up from February, but down from March ‘06. Some analysts will be surprised. Prices will be down from a year earlier, but not down nearly as much as expected from a month earlier. In fact, the median price for Orange County might actually be up slightly from February.

But it’s not really news. And it’s not even what you think it is.

It’s not news because they’ll be reporting what took place back in January and early February, when those homes that closed in March actually went into escrow, as we explained in “Market Predictions 101: Our Two Real Estate Cycles.” By the time “DataSlow” reports them, they’ll be almost 3 months old.

“DataSlow’s” median price numbers aren’t what you think because any average, median or mean (for you mathematicians), can be skewed by shifts between market segments, as was so clearly pointed in a recent statistical study by Zillow’s number-cruncher.

For example, let’s say DataQuick started reporting “median grocery prices” at your local Vons. In November, when lots of people are buying expensive items like turkeys, that median would go up. Now the prices of things might actually be down (at least in our hypothetical, if not in the real world right now. Turkey might be cheaper than it was a month earlier. But because more people were buying turkeys instead of hamburger, the median price would still go up.

Same thing in the real estate market. When there are more first time, low end, buyers the median goes down. When there are more high end buyers, it goes down.

That’s why through most of 2006 DataQuick’s median price kept moving up, even as prices in most neighborhoods were dropping. As subprime loans stated to dry up, activity was switching from the low end to the middle and higher prices. So the median average moved up, since more of the sales were in higher priced neighborhoods, even as the prices in those neighborhoods fell.

More recently, there’s been an increase in lower end sales as lenders foreclose on many subprime borrowers in starter homes, then quickly unload the property at whatever price the market will bear. Meanwhile, most high end homeowners moved up and put a substantial down payment into their home, so there are far fewer foreclosures and distressed sales in the higher neighborhoods. Instead, those homeowners for the most part have decided to just wait out the current down turn.

In 2006, DataQuick’s median price was going up while actual prices were dropping in most neighborhoods. Lately, DataQuick’s median has been dropping faster than actual prices in most neighborhoods. We believe the actual drop in So Cal home values from top to current bottom is about 25 – 30% (less in higher end areas, more in condos, starter areas, and areas with lots of new construction).

In our next post, which should be out soon, we’ll combine that last little nugget of information with our Bernanke post and our Predictions 101 post to update our own predictions.

In the meantime, your thoughts and questions are always welcome. If there isn’t a “Leave a Comment” box below, then click on the “0 comments” or “2 comments” comment-counter just below this paragraph on the right. Make up a “Name” or just use your first name, as that will be public. Your e-mail will remain entirely confidential, but we can use it for a confidential response if requested. Thanks for visiting!

So Maybe It Wasn’t an April Fools’ Post?

Talk about being out in front of a story!

Early April 1, before I went to the Westminster Justice Center for a day of Jury Duty (details later this week), we put up our most popular post yet, “Major Housing Breakthrough Near?“

“It looks like our leaders may finally be setting aside their egos and personal agendas to work together for the common good,” we wrote two days ago.

“Behind-the-scenes discussions between Congressional leaders and the Bush administration may be about to bear fruit. And that fruit would be a pragmatic Housing Relief Act of 2008 which combines the best ideas from partisans of all stripes to provide both immediate relief and long term reform.”

So guess what’s the top story on Los Angeles Times‘ website this morning? “Senate advances mortgage relief plan.”

Here are the first two paragraphs of today’s Times’ article:

WASHINGTON — Senate Democratic and Republican leaders reached agreement Wednesday on a multibillion-dollar package to address rampant foreclosures and other problems stemming from what may be the worst housing slump since the Great Depression.

The compromise measure, placed on a fast track by the election-year desire to mollify voters, could be approved by the Senate as early as this week. It would be the first significant intervention by federal lawmakers to aid victims of the mortgage crisis.

Looks like you heard it here first!

Now, we’re pleased with our reputation for honesty. Really (see Redfin’s post, “A Realtor We Can Trust“). So we’ll also have to disclose that we got a couple of “minor” details wrong near the end of our April 1 prophetic post.

Like Congress eliminating earmarks and passing a line-item veto and Bush cutting back on Iraq spending to help fund the bill. And the AARP agreeing to support a one year suspension of social security’s cost of living increase. And McCain picking Obama as his running mate in the midst of all the bipartisan unity.

But it was posted on April 1.

By that we mean, it took a couple of days for all the details to come out. Right?

Shoot, our first report on a pending bipartisan breakthrough on housing was posted on March 31 (“Pragmatic White House Ready to Help Out?“).

“We think it could be a major step in the right direction–or a major disaster. As always, “the devil is in the details.” We just hope & pray that our employees in Washington (yup–we pay their salaries!) will finally put special interests, dogma, and party politics aside long enough to work for the common good, ” we wrote back then.

Who knows, maybe they were listening in Washington.

So maybe that post coming out on April 1 was just a coincidence? What are we going to do if we get some unbelievable, hot info on April 1? Sit on it until April 2, and let the big boys get ahead of us?

In any case, the devil is still going to be in the details, which range from federal mortgage relief bonds to tax breaks for homeowners, builders, and people who buy and occupy foreclosures.

There’s still time for partisanship to kill the bill, with hearings in the house scheduled for next week. Wouldn’t it be nice if our representatives will use that time to make the bill better for the nation as a whole, rather than to grandstand or advance partisan interests.

Otherwise, the joke might just be on us.

Only we wouldn’t be laughing.